Armstrong Tru-Trac AT vs Milestar Patagonia A/T R tires

Choosing the right tire for your pickup truck or SUV often involves navigating the balance between on-road comfort and off-road capability. Two popular contenders in this category are the Tru-Trac AT from Armstrong and the Patagonia A/T R from Milestar. While both are designed to handle mixed driving conditions, they have their own distinct characteristics.

The Armstrong Tru-Trac AT is an all-terrain tire that focuses on providing reliable performance for everyday driving. It's designed to offer a good blend of on-road handling, a comfortable ride, and decent off-road traction for occasional adventures. Armstrong, as a brand, typically emphasizes value and practicality.

On the other hand, the Milestar Patagonia A/T R leans more towards the rugged terrain end of the spectrum. While still aiming for some on-road comfort, it often features a more aggressive tread pattern and reinforced construction to enhance off-road performance, particularly in tougher conditions. Milestar is known for offering tires that have a good balance of performance and affordability.

This comparison will delve into the details of each tire, examining its grip, traction, handling, and longevity in various driving scenarios. So, which is the one that does it better? Let’s compare Armstrong Tru-Trac AT vs Milestar Patagonia A/T R tires based on our SimpleScore scoring mechanism to know the best option.

Armstrong Tru-Trac AT tires

Designed for SUVs and light trucks, the Armstrong Tru-Trac AT is an all-terrain tire that offers a versatile balance of on-road comfort and off-road capability. Its tread pattern is engineered to provide good traction in various conditions, including both highway driving and light off-road adventures. Features like interlocking center blocks and durable construction contribute to the Armstrong tire’s stability and handling.

While the optimized tread pattern of the Tru-Trac AT is designed to minimize road noise for a more comfortable ride on paved surfaces, the sturdy rubber compound helps it resist tears, cuts, and punctures. Backed by a 60,000 mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty, the Armstrong all-terrain tire is made for drivers who need a reliable tire for everyday driving with the added confidence of some off-road performance.

With an 8.2 overall SimpleScore, the Armstrong Tru-Trac AT assures great year-round performance in different driving conditions.

Get Armstrong Tru-Trac AT tires at the best deals for your vehicle here

Milestar Patagonia A/T R tires

The Milestar Patagonia A/T R is also a capable rugged all-terrain tire for light truck and SUV owners who want off-road capability with decent on-road manners. While the Milestar tire features an aggressive tread pattern for enhanced grip on dirt, gravel, and other uneven surfaces, it's engineered to be more durable than a standard all-terrain tire, with reinforced construction.

Besides, prioritizing off-road performance, it also aims to provide a reasonably comfortable ride on pavement. The Patagonia A/T R is a popular choice for those seeking a balance of ruggedness and everyday drivability. For complete peace of mind, the Patagonia A/T R comes with a solid limited tread wear warranty coverage of 50,000 miles.

Scoring an 8.0, the Milestar Patagonia A/T R promises decent traction, grip, handling, durability, and tread life on and off the road.

Get Milestar Patagonia A/T R tires at the best deals for your vehicle here

Armstrong Tru-Trac AT vs Milestar Patagonia A/T R tires on traction

Traction is the most significant aspect defining the performance of all-terrain tires as it determines how well your vehicle will grip surfaces like gravel, mud, and wet roads. A high level of traction ensures better stability and braking, improving the confidence of drivers on both highways and beaten tracks. Both of these all-terrain tires perform great in terms of traction.

The Armstrong Tru-Trac AT boasts a strong SimpleScore of 8.1 in traction, which is impressive for an all-terrain tire. The Tru-Trac AT features four zigzag circumferential grooves that bite into the surface to maintain stability and control. Its interlocking center blocks with slanted edges enhance grip on uneven terrain while making your rides quieter. Thanks to these design elements, the Tru-Trac AT delivers a decent performance in dry and wet conditions.

On the other hand, the Milestar Patagonia A/T R scores 8.0 in traction, slightly behind the Tru-Trac AT. Thanks to its staggered step-down grooves, this all-terrain tire ejects rocks and debris, maintaining traction on rough terrains. Additionally, its angled tread further improves the grip on wet and muddy surfaces.

As evident from the SimpleScores, the Armstrong Tru-Trac AT edges out the Patagonia A/T R in traction with a slightly higher score.

ADVANTAGE: Armstrong Tru-Trac AT

Armstrong Tru-Trac AT vs Milestar Patagonia A/T R tires on handling

When you frequently switch between paved roads and off-road trails, handling becomes a far more crucial factor. Good handling ensures that your SUV or light truck responds accurately to steering inputs and maintains stability during cornering. Both the Armstrong Tru-Trac AT and the Milestar Patagonia A/T R deliver great handling.

With a handling score of 8.1, the Armstrong Tru-Trac AT strikes a great balance between stability and responsiveness. Its interlocking center blocks and slanted edges ensure consistent handling, maintaining its structural integrity even under stress. The rugged casing helps drivers retain stability even at high speeds, while tread design ensures precise maneuvering on both highways and light trails.

On the other hand, the Milestar Patagonia A/T R scores an 8.0 in handling, helping drivers gain stability on rough terrains. Its tread pattern features offset blocks that help drivers maintain grip and control while driving. The Patagonia A/T R has been designed to perform well on loose surfaces, and its chip-and-cut resistant compounds make the ride stable. However, it leans slightly more toward rugged durability than crisp on-road handling.

The handling scores are almost the same, with the Armstrong Tru-Trac AT having a slight upper hand (0.1 points). The advanced tread design and construction of the Tru-Trac AT make it the better choice.

ADVANTAGE: Armstrong Tru-Trac AT

Armstrong Tru-Trac AT vs Milestar Patagonia A/T R tires on longevity

When it comes to all-terrain tires, longevity defines how dependable these tires are over time. All-terrain tires are used on both paved and off-road surfaces, which speeds up wear and tear. You need a long-lasting tire to avoid frequent replacements and enjoy consistent rides on different terrains. Let’s have a look at their longevity scores.

Boasting an 8.8 in longevity, the Armstrong Tru-Trac AT is backed by a 60,000 mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty, making it a highly durable all-terrain tire. Thanks to its rugged casing and interlocking center blocks, the Tru-Trac AT maintains its integrity on off-road trails, which prolongs its service life under tough driving conditions.

The Milestar Patagonia A/T R, with a longevity score of 8.2, also delivers a dependable longevity performance. Backed by a 50,000 mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty, the Milestar tire features a cut and chip-resistant rubber compound, which resists abrasions while navigating off-roads. Its step-down grooves also protect the casing, forcing out debris that triggers faster wear or damage.

While both tires are built to last, the Armstrong Tru-Trac AT stands out with a higher longevity score and a longer tread life warranty. Hence, this all-terrain tire will be a better choice for those prioritizing durability.

ADVANTAGE: Armstrong Tru-Trac AT

When to use each

All-terrain tires are designed with aggressive treads to perform well on beaten tracks, including dirt, mud, rocks, and snow. They are engineered to conquer the challenges of nature and feature strong sidewalls that resist damage and cuts.

If you prioritize long-lasting performance, comfort, and on-road stability, the Armstrong Tru-Trac AT will be the ideal choice. It comes with a 60,000 mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty and a fantastic longevity score. This tire is suitable for daily drivers who explore rugged trails while also navigating highways or suburban roads.

On the other hand, go for the Milestar Patagonia A/T R if you’re solely planning to go off-roading. Its aggressive tread and enhanced cut-and-chip resistance make it ideal for mixed-terrain adventures, including rocky or muddy paths. If you’re looking for a tire capable of delivering consistent performance on tough terrains while being great on paved roads, go for a rugged terrain tire.

Which one should you choose?

Comparing both tires under traction, handling, and longevity parameters, the Armstrong Tru-Trac AT emerges as the clear winner with a higher SimpleScore of 8.2. However, buyers must understand the individual traits of these tires before making a purchase. Now, let’s have a look at the prices of these two all-terrain tires and find out the one that offers better value.

Considering the prices of the 245/65R17 tire size, the Armstrong Tru-Trac AT costs $107 per tire, and four such tires cost $428. On the other hand, the Milestar Patagonia A/T R costs around $146 per tire, and four such tires cost $584 (a difference of $156).

Based on SimpleScore, you can use the Armstrong Tru-Trac AT if you:

• Drive vehicles like the Ford Bronco Sport, RAM 1500 Classic, or Chevrolet Silverado 1500
• Prioritize better traction (8.1 vs 8.0) and handling (8.1 vs 8.0)
• Prefer a long-lasting all-terrain tire (8.8 vs 8.2)
• Are looking for a more affordable tire

You can go for the Milestar Patagonia A/T R if you:

• Drive vehicles like the Jeep Wrangler, Toyota Tacoma, or the GMC Sierra 1500
• Primarily focus on off-roading and less on commuting on smooth roads
• Are fine with buying a slightly expensive tire

Still not sure which tire to buy? Fortunately, SimpleTire is here to help as our helpful agents are more than happy to assist you in selecting the right tire for your ride and budget.